Central Readers
AIM has 60 experienced radiologists, who develop validated imaging protocols and analyze
the images independently, in all radiology fields.
Abdominal Imaging
Cancer Imaging
Cardiovascular Imaging
Chest Imaging
Musculoskeletal Imaging
Neuro Imaging
Pediatric Imaging
Women’s Imaging
Reader's Profile
Park, Seong Ho. MD. PhD.
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Abdomen / Oncology
Kim, Kyung Won. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Body / Oncology
Kim, Jeong Gon. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Genitourinary / Oncology
Kim, Ho Sung. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Head & Neck / Oncology
Suh, Chong Hyun. MD. PhD
Doctor
Asan Medical Center
Oncology
Sunwoo Leonard. MD. PhD
Professor
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Head & Neck
Yun, Tae Jin. MD. PhD
Professor
Seoul National University Hospital
Head & Neck
Yoon, Hee Mang. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Pediatric imaging / Oncology
Lee, Jong Seok. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Body / Oncology
Jung, Seung Chai. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Head & Neck / Oncology
Choi, Seung Hong. MD. PhD
Professor
Seoul National University Hospital
Head & Neck
Choi, Young Joon. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Head & Neck
Koo, Hyun Jung MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Chest / Oncology
Lee, Choong Wook. MD. PhD
Professor
Seoul National University Hospital
Emergency Radiology / Oncology (lymphoma & multiple myeloma)
Chung, Hye Won. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Musculoskeletal / Oncology (lymphoma, multiple myeloma)
Yang, Dong Hyun. MD. PhD
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Cardiac / Chest
Kim, So Yeon. MD. PhD
Professor
Seoul National University Hospital
Abdomen / Oncology
Central Review Workflow
Central reading process is performed as blinded independent image review of each case by two readers as primary readers. These two primary readers must be completely unaware of the findings of each other, including review outcomes of other blinded reader, an adjudicator, and onsite investigators.
When one or more overall time point assessment(s) differs between these two primary readers, it will be re-assessed by a third reader as an adjudicator. At this point, the adjudicator should agree with all-time point assessments from only one of the primary readers.